Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Studies (1), wins

The study is a chess composition, that is a contrived position on the chessboard, in which the white achieves his goal no matter what is the black defense, and the goal is [white plays and wins] (symbol +) or [white plays and draws] (symbol =).

The study can be considered as a special case of the orthodox chess problem. The goal must be achieved (win or draw, just as in a chess game) without a pre-specified number of moves for the variations.
The study has also unique key and unique solution.
Typically, the studies resemble game-finales (end-games) and they have usually few pieces.



White wins


(Problem 84)
A. S. Seletsky,
First Prize, ”Chess in U.S.S.R.”, 1933
White plays and wins
+ (5+4)
[5q2/s2P1k2/2b5/8/8/3S4/4BK2/6Q1]

There are some studies with excellent solutions, they are truly works of art. Such a study is problem-84, by Seletsky, awarded first prize in 1933.

The stipulation white plays and wins forces us to wonder, how much stronger is White?.
White has an excess pawn ready for promotion, but it is already threatened by the black Bishop, the promotion square is guarded by the black Queen, and if the black King moves to capture it, gives discovered check.
The position is much too open and there is no visible way for the white to press the black.

Can you imagine how does White win? Here follows the solution:
Key: 1.Qg5! [d8=Q]
(If 1...Bxd7, then 2.Sf4 and with 3.Bh5+ White wins).
(If 1...Qe7, then 2.d8=Q and White wins).
1...Ke6+ 2.Kg1!!
(We will understand later why this move is noted as excellent, with two exclamation marks).
(It is not good to play 2...Bxd7 3.Bg4+ Kf7 4.Se5+ Ke8 5.Bxd7#)
2...Kxd7 3.Sc5+ Kc8
(It is not good to play 3...Kd6 4.Qg3+ Kd5 5.Bc4+ Kxc4 6.Qb3+ and in the next move the black Queen is lost. If 3...Ke8 4.Bh5+ and Qf8 is lost. If 3...Kc7 / Kd8, then with 4.Se6+ again Qf8 is lost).
4.Ba6+ Kb8
5.Qg3+ Ka8
6.Bb7+ Bxb7
7.Sd7
(The queen Qf8 is under threat and must be moved. A good idea is to give check, but the white King is wisely located on g1 (now the meaning of the second move becomes obvious!) and there is not a safe check from the black. White is also threatening [8.Sb6#] and, if the queen Qf8 leaves row-8, follows mate [8.Qb8#], so...)
7...Qd8
8.Qb8+ Qxb8
9.Sb6#

White, starting from an open position and having a threatened excess pawn, in nine moves, gave with a lonely Knight a smothered mate to black, who got himself cornered.


Let us see a simpler study with similar ending, created by a study-composer with a large production of splendid works. The Russian writer and composer Karl Artur Leonid Kubbel, (06/01/1891 – 18/04/1942), changed his name to Leonid Ivanovich Kubbel after the October 1917 revolution. Leonid had two brothers, Arvid and Evgeny, who were chess-players.

(Problem 85)
Karl Artur Leonid Kubbel,
”150 Endspielstudien”, 1925
White plays and wins
+ (3+5)
[8/4q3/2p5/2s2Q2/p5S1/7k/8/1K6]

Key: 1.Se3+
(Many studies have checking key).
1...Kg3 2.Qg4+ Kf2 3.Qf4+ Ke2 4.Qf1+ Kd2 5.Qd1+ Kc3
6.Qc2+ Kb4 7.Qb2+ Sb3 8.Qa3+! Kxa3 9.Sc2#

The moves of the black were the best, as he tried to save his Queen. It was not enough, because the King was lost.


And now a study were the white wins, avoiding many traps which lead to a draw. The composer of this study is Vladimir Aleksandrowitsh Korol(i)kov, (07/11/1907 – 01/05/1987).

(Problem 86)
V. A. Korolikov,
First Prize, ”Truda”, 1935
White plays and wins
+ (5+6)
[2B5/pR6/2pP1k2/8/6Kb/4p1P1/5p2/8]

Key: 1.d7! Ke7
2.Rb8 Bxg3
(not 2... f1=Q 3.d8=Q+ Kxd8 4.Ba6+ Kc7 5.Bxf1 Kxb8 6.gxh4 and white wins)
3.Ra8
(not 3.Kxg3 f1=Q because the previous moves can be repeated now, but the white is without a pawn)
3...f1=Q 4.d8=Q+ Kxd8 5.Ba6+ Bb8
(playing 6.Rxb8 Kc7 leads to a draw)
6.Bxf1 Kc7 7.Ba6 e2 8.Bxe2 Kb7 9.Bf3 Kxa8 10.Bxc6#


[This post in Greek language].

Monday, May 12, 2008

Solution of Exercise No.5

In Exercise-5 we presented twelve direct-mate problems. Their solutions follow:

(Problem 49)
Comins Mansfield,
1916
White plays and mates in 2 moves
#2 (6+4)
[KR2B3/Bp6/Q7/8/8/8/5S1p/6kr]

Tries: {1.Rxb7? / Kxb7? / Qe2? / Qa1+? / Sh3+? Kg2!}, {1.Qf1+? / Qxb7? / Qg6+? K(x)f1!}.

Key: 1.Bc6! [2.Rg8# / Qa1# / Sh3#]
1...bxc6 2.Rg8#
1...b5 2.Qa1#
1...b6 2.Sh3#
1...bxa6 2.Rb1#
There is a theme BP4 from bPb7. The three threats of the key are separated in the three variations and there is a defense which refutes all the threats of the key but allows another mate. This is the theme Karlström-Fleck.


(Problem 50)
Marble & Bettmann
White plays and mates in 2 moves
#2 (5+2)
[7Q/2p5/1P1S3R/3k4/8/2K5/8/8]

Tries: {1.Qd4+? Kc6!}, {1.Qe5+? Kxe5!}, {1.Sc4? / Sf7? Ke4!}.

Key: 1.Qe8! (zugzwang).
1...Kc5 2.Qb5#
1...c5 2.Qe4#
1...c6 2.Qh5#
1...cxb6 2.Qb5#
1...cxd6 2.Rh5#
There is a theme BP4 from bPc7.


(Problem 51)
Bettmann,
1915
White plays and mates in 2 moves
#2 (13+2)
[4B3/3p4/2P1PQ2/P1k2P1R/4P1S1/1K4R1/5S1B/8]

In the set play: 1...dxc6 / dxe6 2 Qe5#

Tries: {1.Bxd7? / exd7? / Rc3+? Kb5!}, {1.Qd4+? Kxd4!}, {1.Qe5+? / Ka4? Kxc6!}.

Key: 1.Qd8! (zugzwang).
1...Kxc6 / Kb5 2.Qb6#
1...Kd6 2.Rc3#
1...Kd4 2.Qb6#
1...d5 2.Qxd5#
1...d6 2.Qb6#
1...dxc6 2.f6#
1...dxe6 2.fxe6#
There is a theme BP4 from bPd7.


(Problem 52)
Comins Mansfield,
3rd Prize, Memorial L. Segal, Themes-64, 1962
White plays and mates in 2 moves
#2 (7+3)
[8/4p2K/3P4/5kP1/2R1Sp2/1B3Q2/8/8]

Tries: {1.Rc5+? e5!}, {1.Qxf4+? Kxf4!}, {1.Qh3+? Ke5!}.

Key: 1.Sf6! (zugzwang).
1...Kxg5 2.Qxf4#
1...Ke5 / Ke6 2.Qd5#
1...e5 2.Qg4#
1...e6 2.Qxf4#
1...exd6 2.Qd5#
1...exf6 2.Rc5#
There is a theme BP4 from bPe7.


(Problem 53)
C. Morse,
”The Problemist”, 1962
White plays and mates in 2 moves
#2 (9+3)
[5Q2/4Bp2/4P1R1/4R3/4p1BP/4P1k1/8/6K1]

Tries: {1.Qh6? / Bb4? / Be2+? fxg6!}, {1.Rh5? f5!}.

Key: 1.Qb8! [2.Re5~# (goes anyplace except g5 and mates)]
1...f5 2.Rxf5#
1...f6 2.Rh5#
1...fxe6 2.Rxe6#
1...fxg6 2.Rxe4#
There is a theme BP4 from bPf7.


(Problem 54)
Walther Martinus Johannes Jørgensen
Arbejder-Skak, 1950
White plays and mates in 2 moves
#2 (10+8)
[6Q1/1S4p1/2R2S1P/5k2/3P1s1p/5RbP/5p1p/2B2K1s]

Phase of set play: * 1...g5 / g6 / gxf6 / gxh6 2.Qh7# / Qd5# / Sd6# / Qg4#

Phases of virtual play: Tries: {1.Qd5+? Kg6!}, {1.Sd6+? / Rc5+? Kxf6!}, {1.Qf7? gxf6!}, {1.Sf6~? K(x)e4!}, {1.Rxf4+? Bxf4!}.

Phase of actual play: Key: 1.Qe8! (zugzwang).
1...Kg5 2.Qh5#
1...g5 / g6 / gxf6 / gxh6 2.Qe4# / Qe5# / Rc5# / Qh5# (four changed mates)
There is a theme BP4 from bPg7.


(Problem 55)
W. Tura,
First Prize, ”Europe Echecs”, 1962
(There is set play). White plays and mates in 2 moves
* #2 (10+11)
[2B1S1q1/2S1Pb2/1pP3rs/b3k1p1/r2p2R1/BR1p2K1/5Q2/8]

We spot two black Grimshaw intersections at squares b4 and e6 with set mates :
Phase of set play : * 1...Bb4 / Rb4 / Be6 / Re6 2.Qxd4# / Qe1# / Bd6# / Rb5#
(If White tries to exploit b4 as a Nowotny intersection, Black uses the Grimshaw intersection at e6 to close the line of Bc8 towards f5 and to make f5 a flight of the black King).

Phases of virtual play :
Try: {1.Bb4? [2.Qxd4# / Qe1#] Re6! (and there is no mate with 2.Rb5)}
Try: {1.Rb4? (same threats) Be6! (and there is no mate with 2.Bd6)}

There are several more tries: [1 Re4+? Kxe4!], [1 Rxg5+? Rxg5+!], [1 Rb5+? Bd5!], [1 Bd6+? Rxd6!], [1 Qe1+? Bxe1+!], [1 Qxd4+? Rxd4!], [1 Qe3+? dxe3!], [1 Qe2+? dxe2!], [1 Qf6+? Rxf6!], [1 Qf5+? Sxf5+!], [1 Qf4+? gxf4+!].

The key is a Nowotny intersection at e6, Black is defending with interferences at the white Grimshaw intersection b4, closing the line of Ba3 towards d6 and the line of Rb3 towards b5, but this square is also a black Grimshaw intersection, and the white Queen can execute one of the threats [2.Qxd4# / Qe1#].
Phase of actual play: Key: 1.Be6! [2.Rb5# / Bd6#] Bb4 / Rb4 2.Qxd4# / Qe1#.


(Problem 56)
M. Niemeijer,
First Prize, ”Tijdschrift v. d. N. S. B.”, 1928
White plays and mates in 3 moves
#3 (9+8)
[2b3K1/1pPkpp2/1P1P1RP1/3p1p1S/3S1p2/5P2/8/8]

Tries: {1.Re6? fxe6!}, {1.Rxf7? Kxd6!}.
Black pieces have no great mobility. If f7 was missing, black would only move the pawn e7 or Ke8.

Key: 1.gxf7! [2.f8=Q [3.Qxe7#]]
The beauty of the problem is that for each of the four moves of the bPe7, white answers with a different promotion of f7, so the problem is an AUW!
1...e6 2.f8=Q e5 3.Qd8# / Qe7# / Rf7#
1...e5 2.f8=S+ Ke8 3.Sg7#
1...exd6 2.f8=R Ke7 3.R6f7#
1...exf6 2.f8=B Ke8 3.Sxf6#
The same pawn, on the same square, is promoted to four different pieces.


(Problem 57)
Ren A.
White plays and mates in 3 moves
#3 (6+5)
[8/8/6s1/8/8/2s3R1/4P2p/RbSQK2k]

The black King is cornered and a check will finish him. Which piece will give the mate?
Tries: {1.Kd2+? / Kf2+? / Sd3? Sxd1!}.

The Rook Ra1 is a revealer, because it reveals the thought of the composer to use castling. We note that Ra1 and Ke1 have many pieces between them, there is also the guarding of d1 by the Knight Sc3 (as we have seen during virtual play), so White has apparently no time to castle in three moves.
Or has he? Yes, if the key is checking.
Key: 1.Qd5+ Sxd5
2.Sd3 [3.Sf2] Bxd3
3.0-0-0#
The white pawn closes the diagonal d1 – f3 to stop [1.Qf3#].


(Problem 58)
Mertes
White plays and mates in 2 moves
#2 (4+3)
[8/6r1/5Q1b/7k/8/5S1K/4S3/8]

Tries: {1.Qh4+? Kg6!}, {1.Qg5+? Bxg5!}, {1.Qxg7? Bxg7!}, {1.Qf5+? Bg5!}, {1.Qf7+? Rxf7!}, {1.Qxh6+? Kxh6!}, {1.Se5? Rg4!}, {1.Sg3+? Rxg3+!}, {1.Sf4+? Bxf4!}.
We do not need much time to locate the black Grimshaw intersection at g5. We exploit it as Nowotny intersection.
Key: 1.Sg5! [2.Sf4# / Sg3#]
1...Bxg5 / Rxg5 2.Sg3# / Sf4#.


(Problem 59)
Allan Werle,
”Tidskrift för Schack“, 1945
White plays and mates in 4 moves
#4 (2+2)
[8/4P3/8/8/8/8/3p1K2/7k]

Trying {1.e8=Q? d1=S+! 2.Kg3 Se3 3.Qxe3}, black is stalemated, because Qe3 guards g1. For this reason we prefer to have underpromotion at the key.

Key: 1.e8=R! [2.Rg8#] d1=S+
2.Kg3 Se3
3.Rxe3 Kg1
4.Re1#


(Problem 60)
J. A. Schiffmann,
”T N S B Chess Assn. Tourney”, 1929
White plays and mates in 2 moves
#2 (12+8)
[8/1s1Pp3/b3PkSP/R3S1p1/r2Q2P1/p5K1/B4B2/3r1R2]

Tries: {1.d8=Q? Sxd8!}, {1.Sd3+? Rxd4!}, {1.Be1+? Bxf1!}.

Key: 1.Sf8! [2.Sh7#]
1...Rc4 / Bc4 (closing the line of Ba2 towards e6) 2.Be1# / Sd3#
1...Rd3+ / Bd3 2.Be3# / Sc4#

The moves of the Rooks at c4, d3 are dealt by Bf2 which forms a battery with Rf1. The moves of the Ba6 at c4, d3 are dealt by Se5 which forms a battery with Qd4.
In this problem the theme TRD is presented:


Theme TRD : It is a double Grimshaw, which is formed from two Rooks and a Bishop, or from two Bishops and a Rook. (The theme is also called Three Rider Double).

The theme is named in honor of Thomas Rayner Dawson, very prolific British composer, who died in 1951. Dawson is considered the inventor of the fairy chess. The fairy chess uses many (over a thousand) fairy pieces or different chessboards or different conditions modifying the rules of the play.


[This post in Greek language].

Friday, May 09, 2008

Lorenzo Mabillis

Lorenzo Mabillis was a lyrical poet from the Ionian Islands, a warmhearted patriot, and a strong composer of chess problems.
He was born at 06/09/1860 in Ithaca, Greece. He was strong-built, blond with blue eyes. His parent came from Corfu, (while his grandfather came from Spain), and he lived there a great part of his life. Initially he was a student at school "Kapodistrias" of Corfu, having J. Romanos and J. Polylas as teachers.
In 1879 he attended lessons in the University of Athens, Department of Philosophy.
In 1880 went to Germany to study Literature and Philosophy. His studies lasted fourteen years, and he was influenced by the theories of Friedrich Nietzsche (Mabillis has written a sonetto titled "Yperanthropos" (= Uebermensch)), by the ”Critique of Pure Reason” of the rationalist Immanuel Kant, and by ”The World as Will and Representation” of the pessimist Arthur Schopenhauer. He was occupied with sanscrit philosophical texts and has translated fragments of the Indian Epic ”Mahabharata”. During his staying in Germany he wrote lyrical poems (mainly sonnets) and composed chess problems which were published in German magazines.
In 1884 his first poem was published in "Messiniakos Typos", and he continued publishing poems and translations in magazines of Athens (Greece), Alexandria (Egypt), and Leipzig (Germany). The Mabillis's sonnets had perfect construction and excellent content, which was characterized by obvious pessimism. It is very difficult for anyone to find such integrity, either in the Greek language or in another language. His sonnets, with hendecasyllable verses, are much more elaborate and artful than the works of his contemporaries, (see ”Patrides”, Costis Palamas, 1895), and introduce new elements, as the beginning of a sentence in the middle of the verse, the use of dialog, etc..
In 1887 he participated as Lorenzo Mabillis in the chess tournament of Frankfurt.
In 1889 he participated as Sillibam in the chess tournament of Breslau (south Silesia in Poland).
In 1890, with his dissertation about the Byzantine chronographer Skylitsis, he earned PhD degree at the University of Erlangen (Bavaria).
In 1896 Mabillis participated in the revolution of Crete, fighting on the side of the rebels on the rocky Cretan mountains.
In 1897, during Greek - Turkish war, Mabillis gathered seventy volunteers from Corfu, and they went to fight in Hepirus where he was wounded at the hand. The expenses of the campaign of these volunteers were covered by him.
In 1909 he became enthusiastic preacher of the uprising.
In 1910 he was elected in Corfu as member of Parliament.
In 1911, defending the language of the common people ("Dimotiki") in the Greek parliament he said, addressing the followers of the puristic language ("Katharevoussa") : There is no vulgar language. There are vulgar men, and there are many vulgar men speaking the purified language. ("Newspaper of Parliament debates", Second Revisional Parliament, 1911, p. 689, session 36).
In 28/11/1912, during the First Balkan War, the last poet of the ”Heptanissian school” fell heroically for the fatherland, as commander of his company of volunteers, in the Driskos battle near Ioannina of Hepirus.

We give here an amateur translation of the poem Oblivion by Lorenzo Mabillis:

The dead who forget the bitterness of life are good-fortuned.
When the sun is sinking and twilight follows, do not cry for the dead, however great is your sorrow.
Such an hour the souls are thirsty and go to the crystalline fountain of forgetfulness,
but mire will blacken the water if a tear drops for them, coming from their loving ones.
And if they drink muddy water, as they pass through meadows of daffodils,
they remember again old pains that were living inside them...
If you can do nothing else but cry in the afternoon, let your eyes mourn the alive ones:
they want - but they can't forget.



Chess Problems

Lorenzo Mabillis can be considered as the first Greek composer of chess problems with international fame.
In the next diagram, (which we found in the Greek magazine ”Ellinika Skakistika Chronika” No.8, 1971), we see a direct-mate three-mover, where the white Queen dominates either with her presence or with her sacrifice.

(Problem 121)
Lorenzo Mabillis,
Akademisches Monatsheft für Schach, Nr. 37, März 1893
White plays and mates in 3 moves
#3 (5+10)
[K2s3b/p2r4/2R5/2rp4/1p1k1B2/3p1Q2/2bS4/8]

Let us see the solution of the problem:
Tries: {1.Rxc5? Kxc5!}, {1.Be3+? / Qf2+? / Qe3+? Kc3!}.

Key: 1.Qh1! (White threatens 2.Qa1+ Rc3 3.Qg1#, and also 2.Qxh8+ Rg7 3.Qxg7#. If 1...Rxc6, to create a flight c5 for the black King, then 2.Qg1+ Kc3 3.Qa1#).
1...Rg7 (It seems that black has covered the two initial threats, but...)
2.Qxd5+ (...finally the Queen has relocated the Rook Rd7).
2...Kxd5 3.Rd6#,
or 2...Rxd5 3.Rc4#,
or 2...Kc3 3.Qe5# (since Rc5 is pinned and Bh8 does not guard e5 any more).


The next problem is a more-mover with Indian theme.

(Problem 137)
Lorenzo Mabillis,
”Schach, Organ des Schachclubs Altműnchen”, Problem No.206, 1891
White plays and mates in 4 moves
#4 (7+2)
[4K3/8/2R5/4k3/2P4P/4P3/8/1B1b2s1]

Tries: {1.Ke7? / Kf7? / Kd7? Bc2!}, {1.Re6+? Kxe6!}, {1.Sf3+? Bxf3!}, {1.Bg6? Bh5!}, {1.Bd3? Be2!}.

Key: 1.Bh7! [2.Ke7 [3.Re6#]]
1...Bh5+ 2.Ke7 Bg6 3.Rxg6 Ke4 4.Re6#

As we see, the problems by Mabillis have strategic content.


The next problem is relevant with the Bohemian school with the pure mates. White marches undaunted in his plan disregarding the way of defense of the black:

(Problem 138)
Lorenzo Mabillis,
”Ellinika Skakistika Chronika” No.8, 1971
White plays and mates in 4 moves
#4 (8+5)
[1S6/4R3/5B1b/P2k2p1/3ppP2/1P6/K7/1B6]

Tries: {1.Re5+? Kd6!}, {1.Rd7+? Ke6!}.

Key: 1.Ka3!
1...Kc5 2.Ba2 Kb5 3.b4 ~ 4.Rb7#
1...Bf8 2.Ba2 Bxe7+ 3.b4+ Kd6 4.Be5#
1...Bg7 2.Ba2 Bxf6 3.b4+ Kd6 4.Rd7#
1...e3 2.Ba2 d3 3.b4+ Kd6 4.Rd7#

Bibliographical sources

"Lorenzo Mabillis", article by Photis Mastihiadis, magazine "Ellinika Skakistika Chronika", issue 8, March 1971, p. 80

"Anthology of Neohellenic Poetry", VI-PER #100, editions "Papyros PRESS", Athens, 1971

"With Greek Ideology", Nikolaos Karras, editions "Pelasgos", Athens, 1998


[This post in Greek language].

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Themes Hamburg and Dresden

We continue presenting problems of the three relevant themes: theme Roman, theme Hamburg, theme Dresden. These themes contain the following common elements:

(a) The problems have at least one try.
(b) There is a General plan (German : Hauptplan), which becomes obvious with the moves after the try (the virtual play), but is not successful.
(c) A Pre-plan (German : Vorplan) is applied, which starts with the key and continues with modification of the defensive moves. Then the general plan reappears and is finally applied.
(d) The themes require at least 3 moves.

Theme Hamburg : The move of a black piece changes the way of defense of another piece.


(Problem 77)
Siegfried Brehmer,
Second Prize, ”German Ring Tourney”, 1948
White plays and mates in 3 moves
#3 (8+8)
[7b/5pr1/S1k5/KR1R4/1P2p1b1/S1p1P3/5P1s/8]

First we see some tries with checking moves:
Tries: {1.Sb8+? Kc7!}, {1.Rd6+? Kxd6!}, {1.Rb6+? Kxd5!}, {1.Rbc5+? Kb7!}.

Next we see two tries relevant with the theme, (thematic tries):
Tries: {1.Sc4? [2.Rd6+] Rg6!}, {1.Rd4? [2.Rb6+] Rg5!}

Key: 1.f4! [2.Rb6 Kxd5 3.Sc7#].
If the pawn f7 moves, the Rook Rg7 will guard c7 (but then, the defensive moves of the Rook will be modified):
1...f6 2.Sc4 (and there is not the defense Rg6) Rd7 3.Rdc5#
1...f5 2.Rd4 (and there is not the defense Rg5) Rb7 3.Rbc5#
And another variation with en-passant capture of a pawn:
1...exf3 e.p. 2.e4 (holds Rd5) ~ 3.Rb6#

The Rook Rg7 has adequate defenses for the thematic tries with moves on file-g, but the pawn f7 changes the way of defense of the Rook, forcing it to move on row-7. When the Rook makes its defensive moves there blocks flights of the black King.




And now let us see the third theme of the group Roman - Hamburg - Dresden.

Theme Dresden : The move of a black piece changes the (good) defense of piece-A to (inadequate) defense of piece-B.


(Problem 78)
Erich-Ernest Zepler,
Fourth Prize, ”Dresdener Anzeiger“, 1927
White plays and mates in 3 moves
#3 (3+12)
[k7/s1K1p3/R1pp3p/1p1r1p2/3r4/2p5/2Q5/b7]

There are several tries: {1.Rxa7+? Kxa7!}, {1.Rb6? Sc8!}, {1.Qxf5? Rxf5!}, {1.Qxc3? Bxc3!}, {1.Qe2? Ra4!}.

Another two tries relevant with the theme: {1.Qg2? [2.Qg8#] Rg4!}, {1.Qa2? [2.Rxa7#] Ra4!}.

Key: 1.Qf2! [2.Qg1 [3.Qg8#]].
The Rook Rd4 can not move because of Qxa7#.
1...f4 (if white plays 2.Qg1, black will continue with 2...Rg5)
2.Qg2 (not 2.Qa2? Ra4!) Rg5 3.Qxc6#
1...b4 (if white plays 2.Qg1, black will continue with 2...Rb5 and 3...Rb8)
2.Qa2 (not 2.Qg2? Rg4!) Ra5 3.Qg8#

In the virtual play the Rook Rc4 has adequate defense.
The moves of the pawns f5-f4 or b5-b4 change the 'defenses with Rc4' to 'defenses with Rc5', which are unable to stop the mate because they open the diagonals passing from c5.


[This post in Greek language].

Roman (2)

We have already said that in the Roman theme a black piece, that can defend adequately, is relocated in a position, from where it can defend again, but not quite successfully.


(Problem 75)
A. E. Plesnivy,
First Prize, ”Narod. Politika”, 1928
White plays and mates in 3 moves
#3 (7+14)
[2S1Bk1B/2pp1P2/4p2p/1pp4S/8/Q7/psb1rbr1/K3s3]

Tries: {1.Bg7+? Rxg7!}, {1.Qxc5+? Bxc5!}, {1.Qg3? Bd4!}
We write the next two tries apart, because they reveal that in this problem there is a double application of the Roman theme :
Tries: {1.Sf6? [2.Sxd7#] Rd2!}, {1.Bf6? [2.Be7#] Bh4!}

Key: 1.Qe3! [2.Qxh6#]
1...Rxe3 2.Sf6 Rd3 3.Sh7#
The Rook Re2 has adequate defense Re2-d2, but when it is relocated to e3 its defense Re3-d3 closes the line of the Bishop Bc2 and allows mate on h7.
1...Bxe3 2.Bf6 Bg5 3.Bg7#
The Bishop Bf2 has adequate defense Bf2-h4, but when it is relocated to e3 its defense Be3-g5 closes the line of the Rook Rg2 and allows mate on g7.


Let us see the next problem-76 with Roman theme, a more-mover by Rehm, in which problem we observe pericritical moves.


(Problem 76)
Hans – Peter Rehm,
First Prize, ”Leipzig Olympiad”, 1960
White plays and mates in 7 moves
#7 (9+11)
[2BB1K2/1p2pP2/5k1p/2pR1p1P/1P5P/r4p2/2bsr2S/8]

There are some checking tries, but they do not lead to mate in seven moves.
Tries: {1.Bxe7+? Rxe7!}, {1.Rd6+? Ke5!}, {1.Rxf5+? Bxf5!}, {1.Sg4+? fxg4!}.

This try, which is written separately, is the one containing the general plan. The plan may be refuted, but with the application of a pre-plan, the general plan leads to the solution.
Try: {1.Kg8? Rg2+! 2.Sg4+ Rxg4+ 3.Kf8 Re3!}

Key: 1.Ke8! Ba4+
2.b5 Bxb5+
3.Kf8 Bd3 (because there is 4.Sg4+ fxg4 5.Rf5#)
4.Kg8! (with the black Bishop now on d3, there is no Ra3-e3 move anymore)
4...Rg2+ 5.Sg4+ Rxg4+ 6.Kf8 Re4 (an obstacle for the Bishop Bd3) 7.Rxf5#

The Rook Ra3 may be played to e3 to inhibit mate on e7. The Bishop Bc2 holds f5 to inhibit mate by the white Rook there. Bc2 is relocated to d3 from where it guards f5, but closes the line of Ra3.
The Rook Re2 is relocated to g4. Again a threat on e7 appears and only Rg4 can act, it goes to e4, closes the line of Bd3, allows mate on f5.
The moves Bc2 – a4 – b5 – d3, Re2 – g2 – g4 – e4 are called pericritical moves.


[This post in Greek language].