Showing posts with label (GRE) Pantavos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label (GRE) Pantavos. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Cooperation of composers (4)

In this post we see two helpmates and a direct mate, which are the result of cooperation of some Greek composers.
When chess composers are working together, the egoism is retreating. The composers cooperate and their friendship is elevated.

Problem_766
Byron Zappas and Nikos Siotis
Recommendation, Jubilee Tourney C. Goumondy-40, 1986

1B6/5R2/6p1/2s3p1/3Sk1p1/3p4/3brp2/7K (4 + 9)

h#2, 3.1.1.1 (Helpmate two-mover, three solutions)

1.Re3 Sf5 2.Kf3 Sg3# (Knight - Rook battery)
1.Be3 Rc7 2.Kf4 Re7# (Rook - Bishop battery)
1.Ke3 Ba7 2.Se4 Sc2# (Knight - Bishop battery)

The white pieces form batteries in a circular manner. Black begins with putting a piece on e3 and is self-blocked. There is a Grimshaw interference (bR and bB) on e3 which is exploited by White giving Anderssen mates (the white piece A is interposed to white piece B, Black moves, the white piece B moves and gives indirect check).



Problem_767
Nikos Pergialis and Manos Pantavos
original

8/7R/B7/8/8/1kP1S2R/8/2K5 (6 + 1)

#2 (two-mover)

Tries : {1.Sc2? A Ka4! a}, {1.Bc4+? B Kxc3! b}

Key : 1.Ra7!
1…Ka4 a / Ka3 / Ka2 2.Bc4# B
1…Kxc3 b 2.Sc2# A

A miniature presenting theme Banny (tries {1.A? a!}, {1.B? b!} but after the key the defense of each try is mated by the key of the other try 1...a 2.B#, 1...b 2.A#).
The key forms an indirect battery (because it aims to a flight of the bK, not straight on it) and it is like an ambush.



Problem_768
Ioannis Kalkavouras and Panagiotis Konidaris and Emmanuel Manolas
Kudesnik, 2013

8/1p3q2/8/p4r1b/2kS1R2/2pS1s2/4BK2/8 (5 + 8)

h#2, 4.1.1.1 (Helpmate two-mover, four solutions)

1.Sd2 Bxh5 2.Kxd3 Be2# (sacrifice of knight d3, switchback of  wB)
1.Rd5 Rxf7 2.Kxd4 Rf4# (sacrifice of knight d4, switchback of wR)

1.Rc5 Sc1+ 2.Kb4 Sc2# (the knights move from d3 d4 to c1 c2)
1.b6 Se6+ 2.Kb5 Se5# (the knights move from d3 d4 to e5 e6)

This belongs to the subgenre HotF, Helpmate of the Future, where the similar solutions appear in pairs. In the first pair of solutions the bK comes near and is mated by contact, while in the second pair of solutions the bK goes away because of check and the white knights mate from afar by firing two batteries (direct and indirect).
In all the solutions the black pieces make preventive self-block, (blocking a square which will become a flight after the move of the bK).


Problem_769
Harry Fougiaxis and Kostas Prentos
2nd Prize, 7th Moskovskaya Matreshka, Wageningen, 2006

3b4/1r3Bpq/p1s1Ss1p/1p3P1p/1Pk2K1R/2r5/4P3/8 (7 + 12)

h#2, (Helpmate two-mover),
a) diagram, b) wKf4 < -- > wSe6

a) 1.Se7 Sc5+ 2.Sfd5+ Ke5#
b) 1.Sd7 Sd3+ 2.Sd4+ Kd6#

2x2 batteries are fired. Self-interferences, Cross-checks and Royal-battery mates. (The problem is included in the FIDE Album 2004/2006, p.285, E168 with 8 points).

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Nine direct two-movers

The orthodox directmate compositions of a few moves are very helpful to chess players, learning to find the mate in a given position.
Today we publish nine two-movers by the known composer Nikos Pergialis. And when we say composer, let us not forget that he is the Last Rebetis (=Composer of Rebetiko songs)!
In two of the compositions there is a co-author, the good chess-player Manos Pantavos.

You will see the problems and you will try to find the mating nets, but most of the times the compositions contain, besides the unique way to find the mate, an inner beauty. In the solutions we write about the Themes that are hidden in these problems.


Problem-661
Nikos Pergialis and Manos Pantavos
original
8/8/b1r1p3/Q7/2k2S2/2p2S2/2K5/8 (4 + 5)
#2
Set Play (if it was Black's turn to play) :
1...Bb5 [a] 2.Qxc3# [A]
1...Rc5 [b] 2.Qa4# [B]

Tries (with try-moves those moves that gave mate in the set play)
{1.Qxc3+? [A] Kb5!},
{1.Qa4+? [B] Kc5!}
Try (with a threat now, a move that gave mate in the set play)
{1.Sd4? [2.Qxc3# [A] ] Kxd4!}
Tries (various, making the discovering of the key more difficult)
{1.Se5+? Kd4!}, {1.Sg2? [2.Se3#] Bb5!}, {1.Qb4+? Kxb4!}
Try (thematic, with Black defenses like the ones of the set play, but different mates)
{1.Qb6? [2.Se5#]
1...Bb5 [a] 2.Qd4# [C]
1...Rc5 [b] 2.Qb3# [D]
but 1...Rxb6!}

Key: 1.Sd3! [2.Sde5#] (where, in the same Black defenses, the mates are changed again)
1...Bb5 [a] 2.Qa2# [E]
1...Rc5 [b] 2.Qxc5# [F]

The problem is a Zagoruyko 3x2 (in 3 phases, for the same 2 defenses, we have changed mates).


Problem-662
Nikos Pergialis and Manos Pantavos
original
2R5/2K2B2/8/2k5/3S3r/PP2Bs2/1q1r1SR1/8 (9 + 5)
#2
Set play :
1...Se1 / Sg1 / Sh2 / Sxd4 / Sg5 2.R(x)g5#
1...Rc2 / Re2 / Rd3 2.S(x)d3#
1...Rh1 / Rh2 / Rh3 / Re4 / Rh5 / Rh6 / Rh7 / Rh8 2.S(x)e4#
1...Qa1 / Qc1 / Qa2 / Qc2 2.b4#

Key : 1.Rb8! [2.Rb5#]
1...Sxd4 2.Rg5#
1...Rdxd4 2.Sd3#
1...Rhxd4 2.Se4#
1...Qxd4 2.b4#
1...Qxb3 2.Sxb3#

The composer Nikos Pergialis writes a verse (translated here) :
"Little Nikos, Little Manos
we are dealing four times with pins,
and as it seems,
we have transferred mates".

We see theme Zilahi (the wSd4 in one variation is captured, while in another variation it gives mate), multiple Black defenses on the same square d4 with multiple captures of the white Knight, tranferred mates, cross-captures (bQb2 and wSd4), direct self-block and pin-mate.


Problem-663
Nikos Pergialis
original
8/3spS2/2s2p2/3R4/2b1k3/1SK3Q1/8/3R4 (6 + 6)
#2
Key: 1.Rh5! [2.Sd2#]
1...Sce5 2.Rd4#
1...Sde5 2.Sc5#
1...e5 2.Sd6#
1...f5 2.Sg5#
1...Bxb3 2.Re1# (Rare mirror-mate, with all bK flights empty).

There are multiple defenses with blocking of e5.
We see the theme Anti-Somov A1 (The control of a square x of the black King field by a white piece is removed by the threat (which is not made by this piece). This is possible because a third white piece controls x (this control exists before the threat). Black defends by removing this third control.). Here d5 is controlled by wRh5, thus we can remove the controlling by the third piece wRd1 when threating Sb3-d2.
We also see the theme Somov B (The control of a square x of the black King field by a white piece is removed by the mating move (which is not made by this piece). This is possible because the previous black move has blocked x.). Here f5 is controlled by wRh5, but when it blocked by the black Pawn, then the wSf7 can close the line of wRh5.
When the two themes, Somov and anti-Somov, coexist we say there is the Theme Isaev.


Problem-664
Nikos Pergialis
original
1b2B1R1/3S4/8/2S2k2/5r2/3P1bP1/3K1R2/8 (8 + 4)
#2
Tries : {1.Rxf3? [2.g4#] Rxf3!}, {1.Rg5+? Kxg5!}

Key : 1.Bf7! [2.Be6#]
1...Bd5 2.g4#
1...Re4 2.dxe4#

We see the half-pinned bRf4 and bBf3, and the pin-mates.
Comment by the Last Rebetis, Nikos Pergialis :
"Two little pawns for their first time
achieve mate the little rascals
(I mean, in this theme,
Emmanuel my good friend)".


Problem-665
Nikos Pergialis
original
8/S5b1/2P1p3/2r1k3/5RKB/8/b7/2SR4 (7 + 5)
#2
Key: 1.Be7! [2.Bd6#]
1…Bf8 2.Bf6#
1…Bd5 2.Sd3#
1…Rd5 2.Re1#
1…Rxc6 2.Sxc6#

In the self-block with Bd5 or Rd5, the mates are different and this is called anti-Dual.
There is also theme Somov B (when the Black Bishop blocks e5, the white Knight can close the line of the white Rook d1).


Problem-666
Νίκος Περγιάλης
original
8/3K2s1/Rp6/S1k3S1/1pPp4/6s1/8/2B5 (6 + 6)
#2
In the set play we see full block, that is if was Black's turn to play every move would lead to mate directly :
1...S3~ 2.S(x)e4#
1...S7~ 2.S(x)e6#
1...b3 2.Ba3#
1...d3 2.Be3#
1...b5 / bxa5 2.Rc6#

There two tries holding the full block : {1.Bb2? d3!}, {1.Bd2? b3!}

Key : 1.Bf4! [2.Βd6#] (White abandons the full block and begins with a threat)
1...Se4 2.Sxe4#
1...S3f5 2.Se4#
1...S7f5 2.Se6#
1...Se8 2.Se6#
1...d3 2.Be3#
1...bxa5 2.Rc6#

Comment by the composer : "This unsignificant theme-idea is, in my opinion, one of the more difficult orthodox problems, because we must have a block in the set play and a threat in the solution. The pieces are positioned ideally, because White should not have a waiting move. If the wK moves to c7 (to keep controlling c6), it is exposed to check (bSe8+), and if the rest white pieces move, the block breaks and flights are created.
The problem can become a waiter, with moving all pieces one file to the right, with key 1.Ra6!"


Problem-667
Nikos Pergialis
original
8/5p2/5P1p/4pP1k/4S1b1/6K1/7P/5Q2 (6 + 5)
#2
In the set play, with full block, all the Black moves are answered with direct mate :
1...Bd1 2.Qxd1# / Qh3#
1...Be2 2.Qxe2# / Qh3#
1...Bf3 2.Qxf3# / Qh3#
1...Bh3 2.Qxh3#
1...Bxf5 2.Qxf5#

There are tries keeping the full block : {1.Qg2? Bxf5!}, {1.h4? Bh3!},
and a try with threat : {1.Qc4? [2.Qxf7#] Bxf5!}.

Key : 1.h3! [2.hxg4#]
1...Bd1 2.Qxd1#
1...Be2 2.Qxe2#
1...Bf3 2.Qxf3#
1...Bxh3 2.Qxh3#
1...Bxf5 2.Qxf5#

The initial full block is transformed to a threat (Block-Threat problem). In the duel between bB and wQ the winner is the wQ  grabbing the opponent bB (theme Grab, if it happens more than two times), no matter how bB corrects his destination square (Black correction).


Problem-668
Nikos Pergialis
original
7b/3R3r/1K4B1/1S6/k6B/8/P7/sR1S4 (8 + 4)
#2
In the set play there are some prepared mates :
1...Bc3 2.Sdxc3#
1...Sc2 2.Bxc2#
1...Bd4+ 2.Rxd4#
1...Rxh4 / Bg7 / Rh5 / Rh6 2.Ra7#
1...Rg7 2.Sdc3# / Rd4#

Tries : {1.Sdc3+? [A] Bxc3! [b] }, {1.Rd4+? [B] Bxd4+! [b] }, {1.Rb4+? Kxb4!}, {1.Ra7+? Rxa7!}, {1.Be7? [2.Rb4# / Ra7#] Rxe7!}.

Key : 1.Be1! [2.Rb4#]
1...Bc3 [a] 2.Sdxc3# [A]
1...Sc2 2.Bxc2#
1...Bd4+ [b] 2.Rxd4# [B]
1...Rh4 2.Ra7#
1...Sb3 2.axb3#
1...Bb2 2.Sxb2#

Theme Vladimirov : Two tries (A and B) are parried by the Black defenses (a and b). After the key, the defenses (a and b) allow the mates (A and B).
The black move 1...Sb3 corrects 1...Sc2 (black correction), without success.


Problem-669
Nikos Pergialis
original
B7/B7/8/6R1/2r1S2K/4p2S/1R6/4r2k (7 + 4)
#2

Tries  : {1.Rh2+? Kxh2!}, {1.Rg1+? Rxg1!}, {1.Kg3? [2.Sef2# / Rh2#] Rg1+!}.

Key : 1.Bb8! [2.Rh2#]
1...Re2 2.Rg1#
1...Rc2 2.Sef2#
1...Rxe4+ 2.Bxe4#
1...Rc7 2.Sg3#
1…e2 2.Shf2#

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Nikos Pergialis & Manos Pantavos

The Greek composers Nikos Pergialis and Manos Pantavos are creating together nice problems, in miniature or meredith form.
In this post we present five original problems by them, all direct-mate two-movers, and we thank them very much.



N. Pergialis (Greece), M. Pantavos (Greece)
original

8/8/2p5/4Q3/K1kb1sRr/2S5/2PP4/8
#2
 
Problem-584

Set play
1...Bg1/f2/xc3 [c] /e3/c5 [a] /b6/a7 2.d3# [A]
1...Sg2/d3 [d] /h3/d5 [b] /h5/g6 2.Qxd4# [B]

Tries : {1.Sb5? Bxe5!}, {1.Rxf4? Rxf4!}, {1.Qxd4+? Kxd4!}, {1.Qxf4? Rxg4!}, {1.Qb5+? cxb5+!}, {1.d3+? Kxc3!}.

Key : 1.Qd6! [2.Qb4#]
1...Bxc3 [c] 2.d3# [A]
1...Sd3 [d] 2.Qxd4# [B] (2.Qxc6??)
1...Bc5 [a] 2.Qd3# [C]
1...Sd5 [b] 2.Qxc6# [D] (2.Qxd4??)
1...c5 2.Qa6#

Half pin. Pin-mates [ACD].
Changed mates (in set-play [ab AB], after the key [ab CD]).
Anti-dual (Sd3, Sd5).
Black correction (Bxc3, Bc5, c5 correct Sd5).

N. Pergialis (Greece), M. Pantavos (Greece)
original

BR1R2Q1/2B5/2p1p1s1/2k5/2b5/2K5/8/4s3
#2
 
Problem-585

Tries : {1.Bb6+? [A] Kb5!},
{1.Bd6+? [B] Kd5!},
 {1.Rb4? [2.Bb6# [A] ] Bb5!},
{1.Rd4? [2.Bd6# [B] ] Bd5!},
 {1.Qxe6? Bxe6!}, {1.Qf8+? Sxf8!}.

Key : 1.Qe8! [2.Qxc6#]
1...Se5 2.Qe7#/Qf8#
1...Se7 2.Qxe7#
1...Bb5 2.Bb6# [A]
1...Bd5 2.Bd6# [B]

Echo(0,0) vertical mirror.
Themes Dombrovskis, Somov B2, Option.

N. Pergialis (Greece), M. Pantavos (Greece)
original

Q4SR1/S2K3B/3P4/4k1P1/8/2s1P1s1/8/8
#2
 
Problem-586

Tries : {1.Sc6+? / Qe8+? Kd5!}, {1.Sg6+? / Rg6? Kf5!}, {1.Qf3? Sce4!}, {1.Qd5+? Kxd5!}.

Key : 1.Rg7! [2.Re7#]
1...Sd5 2.Sc6#
1...Sf5 2.Sg6#

Self-blocks and white interferences.

N. Pergialis (Greece), M. Pantavos (Greece)
original

3SS3/8/8/4k3/4P3/R7/8/3KQ3
#2
 
Problem-587

Tries : {1.Sc6+? Ke6!}, {1.Se6? Kxe6!}, {1.Rc3? / Rd3? / Ra4? / Qb4?Kf4!}, {1.Rf3? / Qh4? Kd4!}, {1.Qd2? / Qf2? Kxe4!}
Thematic tries :
{1.Sf7+?,
1...Kd4 [a] 2.Qb4# [A],
1...Kf4 [b] 2.Qh4# [B], 1...Ke6!},
{1.Qa5+?,
1...Kd4 [a] 2.Qd5# [C],
1...Kf4 [b] 2.Qf5# [D], 1...Kxe4!}.

Key : 1.Re3!,
1...Kd4 [a] 2.Qc3# [E],
1...Kf4 [b] 2.Qg3# [F]

Echo(0,2) vertical mirror. Zagorujko 3x2.
Themes Option, Banny, Dombrovskis (paradoxe).

N. Pergialis (Greece), M. Pantavos (Greece)
original

8/8/R7/S7/1kP2S2/8/R3K3/8
#2
 
Problem-588

Tries : {1.Se6? / Sd3+? [A] Kc3! [a] },
{1.Kd3? / Sd5+? [B] Kc5! [b] },
{1.Rc6? [2.Sd5# [B] ] Kc3! [a] },
{1.Kd2? [2.Sd3# [A] ] Kc5! [b] }.

Key : 1.Ke3!,
1...Kc3 [a] 2.Sd5# [B],
1...Kc5 [b] 2.Sd3# [A]

Themes Dombrovskis, Threat anti-reversal, Banny.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Nikos Pergialis (2)

We will see here some more of the compositions by the 'rembetis' Nikos Pergialis. We have limited our selection to directmate chess problems. As you will note, he likes to create problems having few pieces. In some of the problems he has cooperated with Mr Manos Pantavos.

The two-mover problem-235 has theme Dombrovskis.
The two-mover problem-236 has a good key and theme Pawn – Bishop Grimshaw (also known as Pickabish).
The two-mover problem-237 has theme Fleck.
The two-mover problem-238 has Quaternary Black Correction.
The three-mover problem-239 has theme X-flights and shows three model mates.
The two-mover problem-240 has theme 'changed mates' in a Zagoruyko frame of four phases.


(Problem 235)
Nikos Pergialis & Manos Pantavos,
[Skaki gia Olous], issue 11, May 2005,
Mate in 2.
#2 ( 9 + 2 )
[7K/3Q4/8/2P1k3/2s5/7P/2BP1SP1/6B1]

The problem contains the theme Dombrovskis.

Tries : {1.Qf5+? Kd4!}, {1.Qd6+? / Se4? S(x)d6!}, {1.Qd8? / Sh1? / Bh2+? Kf6!}, {1.Sg4+? Kf4!}.
Thematic tries :
{1.Kg7? [2.Bh2# (A)] Kf4! (a)},
{1.g3? [2.Sg4# (B)] Kf6! (b)}.

Key : 1.h4! (zz, zugzwang).
1...Kf4 (a) 2.Bh2# (A)
1...Kf6 (b) 2.Sg4# (B)
(non thematic variation 1...S~ 2.Qd6#)


(Problem 236)
Nikos Pergialis, 2008
original,
Mate in 2.
#2 ( 5 + 7 )
[7Q/2pbS3/4pK1p/5B2/3k4/4p3/2R5/7r]

Tries : {1.Sc6+? Kd5!}, {1.Kg6+? / Kf7+? e5!}, {1.Rc4+? Kxc4!}.

Key : 1.Qa8! [2.Qe4#]
1...Rh4 2.Qa1#
1...exf5 2.Qd5#

1...c6 2.Qa4#
1...Bc6 2.Qa7#
In the last two variations we observe a Pawn – Bishop Grimshaw intersection, which has the specific name Pickabish intersection.


(Problem 237)
Nikos Pergialis, 2000
original,
Mate in 2.
#2 ( 6 + 6 )
[8/6p1/6S1/3P1prp/2p3k1/Q1S5/5KP1/8]

Tries : {1.Qc1? Rxg6!}, {1.Qd6? h4!}, {1.Sc3~? c3!}.

Key : 1.Sd1! [2.Se3# / Qh3# / Qg3# / Qf3#]
1...c3 2.Se3#
1...f4 2.Qh3#
1...Rxg6 2.Qg3#
1...h4 2.Qf3#

The key introduces four threats but only one can be applied in each variation. The separation of the threats is the theme Fleck.


(Problem 238)
Nikos Pergialis, 1979
original,
Mate in 2.
#2 ( 8 + 2 )
[4S3/3rPK2/2k5/1R3S2/P1PR4/8/8/8]

Tries : {1.Rxd7? [2.Rc7#] Kxd7!}, {1.Rd6+? Rxd6!}, {1.Rdd5? [2.Rdc5#] Rxd5!}.

Key : 1.Ke6! (zz).
1...Ra7 / Rb7 / Rc7 / Rd6+ 2.R(x)d6#
1...Rd8 ( 2.Rd6? . Διόρθωση πρώτου βαθμού) 2.exd8=S#
1...Rxe7+ ( 2.Rd6? / exd8? . Διόρθωση δεύτερου βαθμού) 2.Sxe7#
1...Rd5 ( 2.Rd6? / exd8? / Se7? . Διόρθωση τρίτου βαθμού) 2.cxd5#
1...Rxd4 ( 2.Rd6? / exd8? / Se7? / cxd5? . Διόρθωση τέταρτου βαθμού) 2.Sxd4#

The bR moves in a Cross form and in four destinations is captured : Theme Grab. With each successive move the bR tries to "correct" all the weaknesses, which seem to be created by its unavoidable move.  Thus we have Quartenary black correction, with only ten pieces!


(Problem 239)
Nikos Pergialis & Manos Pantavos, 2000
original,
Mate in 3.
#3 ( 6 + 1 )
[7Q/4K3/8/P7/3S4/2k2P2/1S6/8]


Key : 1.Qh7! (zz).
1...Kb4 2.Qd3 (zz).
____2...Kxa5 3.Qb5#
____2...Kc5 3.Qc4#
1...Kxd4 2.Qd3+
____2...Kc5 3.Qc4#
____2...Ke5 3.Qe4#
1...Kd2 2.Qd3+
____2...Ke1 3.Qe2#
____2...Kc1 3.Qc2#
1...Kxb2 2.Qc2+
____2...Ka3 3.Qb3#
____2...Ka1 3.Sb3#

We see here the theme X-flights and the bK gets mated on the squares e1 – c1 – a1 – a3 – a5 – c5 – e5. Interesting construction with a flight-giving key, sacrificing a Knight.


(Problem 240)
Nikos Pergialis, 2000
original,
Mate in 2.
#2 ( 6 + 6 )
[1B6/8/pk1p4/Spp5/8/5p2/2R2K2/RQ6]

Tries :
{1.Rxc5? [2.Rc6#] (1...b4 / dxc5 2.Qxb4# / Qg6#) 1...Kxc5!},
{1.Rc4? (zz, 1...d5 2.Qg6#) 1...b4!},
{1.Qxb5+? (1...Kxb5 2.Rb2#) 1...axb5!},
{1.Qe1? (zz, 1...d5 / c4 2.Qe6# / Qe3#) 1...b4!}
Thematic tries :
{1.Qb2? (zz, 1...d5 / c4 2.Qf6# [A] / 2.Qd4# [B]) 1...b4!},
{1.Qc1? (zz, 1...d5 / c4 2.Qh6# [C] / 2.Qe3# [D]) 1...b4!},
{1.Qg1? (zz, 1...d5 / c4 2.Qg6# [E] / 2.Kxf3# [F]) 1...b4!},

Key : 1.Qb4! (zz)
1...d5 2.Qxc5# [G]
1...c4 2.Qxd6# [H]
(non thematic variation 1...cxb4 2.Rc6#).

We observe that two black defenses (here 1...d5 / c4 ), always the same, and in various phases of the problem (here the last three tries and the post-key play) are answered with changed mates by the White. This is a Zagoruyko 4x2 (four phases by two variations) frame of presentation of the changed mates theme.


{This post in Greek language).

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Symmetry

We will see the subject of the symmetry in the arrangement of the pieces. In his book "Caissa's Fairy Tales", 1947, the founder of the Fairy Chess T. R. Dawson has studied the apparently simple subject of the symmetry of the position.

The axis of symmetry may be parallel to a row, or parallel to a file (and we usually call it vertical axis), or parallel to a diagonal line. There is also the case of symmetry around a point.

From the Dawson's analysis we gather a few observations :
1. In an apparently symmetrical position, it is possible for the White to have some abilities on the one side (let us say : a move to a side file, a castling move, etc.) which are not available on the other side of the position. This means that the solution is probably non-symmetrical.
2. In an apparently symmetrical position, it is possible for the Black to have different abilities on each of the two sides of the position, resulting in a non-symmetrical solution.
3. In a diagonal symmetry, the Pawns do not have equal abilities of movement on the file or on the row, thus the solution may be non-symmetrical.

When we study a symmetrical position, we decide whether we will maintain the symmetry with the key, or we will break the symmetry of the position.


Let us see the Problem-162, by (the famous in Greece troubadour of rebetico songs) Mr. Nikos Pergialis.


(Problem 162)
Nikos Pergialis,
Newspaper "Eleftherotypia", 17/12/2006
Mate in 2 moves.
#2 (7+9)
[8/3K4/2pBp3/p2k2p1/1ppPpp2/3R4/S5S1/3B4]

Tries: {1.Bc5? e5!}, {1.Be5? c5!}, {1.Sxf4+? gxf4!}, {1.Se3+? fxe3!}, {1.Sc3+? bxc3!}, {1.Sxb4+? axb4!}.

Key : 1.Rd2! (zz). If Black breaks the symmetry, he is lost.
1...a4 / b3 / c3 / c5 / e5 / e3 / f3 / g4
2.Sxb4# / Sc3# / Bb3# / dxc5# / dxe5# / Bf3# / Se3# / Sxf4#

This setting may be moved one file to the right, and the solution will be similar. (When we decide for the final form of our composition, we take care to have more pieces on white squares (or else we transpose the position) in order to be nicely-looking when it will be printed. Here the composer put on white squares 10 from the 16 pieces).
But this setting must not be moved one row upwards!
Do you see the changed detail which leaves the problem without solution?
It is the pawns above the upper Bishop, which, when they are standing on row-7, they can move with double step and thus they can interfere with the checking move of the lower Bishop (so, there is no mate in 2).


In the next Problem-163, by Dawson, it is obvious that if Knight leaves e3, the black King can move, either to d5 with flight to e4, or to f5 with flight to e4, so with the Knight on e8 at the right moment White can mate.


(Problem 163)
T. R. Dawson,
Newspaper "The Times", 23/12/1920
Mate in 6 moves.
#6 (9+6)
[8/8/1p2p2p/1P2P2P/2pPkPp1/2P1S1P1/4K3/8]

Tries : {1.f5? exf5!}, {1.d5? exd5!}, {1.Sxg4? Kf5!}, {1.Sxc4? Kd5!}, {1.Kf2? Kd3!}, {1.Kd2? Kf3!}.

Key : 1.Sc2! (zz, zugzwang).
And how is the Knight going to e8?
By the left side, stepping on the edge file, outside symmetry.
1...Kd5 / Kf5 2.Sb4(+) (zz)
2...Ke4 3.Sa6 (zz)
3...Kd5 / Kf5 4.Sc7 (zz)
4...Ke4 5.Se8 (zz)
5...Kd5 / Kf5 6.Sf6# / Sd6#

If we move the setting one file to left, the Knight must go to e8 by the right side.
If we move the setting one row upwards, the problem is ruined, because the white pawns can achieve solution in four moves (because e is promoted with check).
(The position has only 7 from 15 pieces on white squares, but the composer has preferred to leave the Kings on their initial file-e).


In the miniature Problem-164, by Stavros Iatridis, we see that the key maintains the symmetry, and the two variations end with echo mates. (Please compare with Problem-45, which has diagonal symmetry and similar echo mates).


(Problem 164)
Stavros Iatridis,
Mate in 2 moves.
#2 (4+2)
[8/8/4Q3/4p3/3SkS2/8/4K3/8]

Tries : {1.Qd5+? / Qc6+? / Sb3? / Sc2? / Sf3? / Sf5? / Sc6? / Sb5? / Kd2? Kxf4!}, {1.Qf5+? / Qg6+? / Sd3? / Sg2? / Sh3? / Sh5? / Sg6? / Sd5? / Kf2? Kxd4!}, {1.Qxe5+? Kxe5!}.

Key : 1.Qe7! (zz).
1...Kxf4 / Kxd4 2.Qh4# / Qb4# (echo-mates)



The Problem-165, by Carpenter, has similar position with the previous one but its solution is non-symmetrical.


(Problem 165)
George E. Carpenter,
Dubuque Chess Journal, 1873
Mate in 2 moves.
#2 (5+2)
[4B3/8/4Q3/3SpS2/4k3/8/8/4K3]

Tries : {1.Bb5? / Qc6? / Kd2? Kf3!}, {1.Bh5? / Qg6? / Kf2? Kd3!}, {1.Qxe5+? Kxe5!}.

Key : 1.Qa6! (zz). The Queen needs to reach squares c6 / g6 / e2 and steps on the side file removing one flight but abandoning the guarding of the two Knights.
1...Kxd5 / Kxf5 / Kf3
2.Qc6# / Qg6# / Qe2#

The moves of the wQ to the squares c6 / g6 are seen as tries and also when it gives mates from there.


Many problems have been composed with symmetrical position. Some resemble trees, some are sketches of musical organs, some have the shape of a letter.
Some of these problems are very difficult puzzles. (Remember that the Problem-155 needed retroanalysis in order reveal which of the two en-passant captures was the key).

We will see now the Problem-166, by Anderson, which has diagonal symmetry. The Pawn c6 can move to c5, but it cannot move to d6.


(Problem 166)
William Anderson,
Honourable Mention, Ideal Mate Review, 1984
Helpmate in 5 moves.
h#5 (2+4)
[R7/8/2p5/3k4/4q3/8/6r1/7K]

Key : 1.Rg1+
1...Kh2 2.Rc1 Kg3 3.Qe2 Kf4 4.Rc5 Kf5 5.Qc4 Rd8#


We close this presentation with a nice original problem, by the known chess player (ELO 2225) Mr. Emmanuel Pantavos. Here the symmetry is around a point (a unique point which is the middle of the distance of any pair of pieces similar in value but dissimilar in color).


(Problem 167)
Emmanuel Pantavos,
original, 05/05/2008
Helpmate in 2 moves, Duplex. (2 solutions)
h#2 duplex 2111 (4+4)
[8/5p2/8/1S2kr2/1RK2s2/8/1P6/8]

Black plays...
1.Sd5 Kd3 2.f6 Re4#
1.Ke4 Rb3 2.Re5 Sd6#

White plays...
1.Sd4 Kd6 2.b3 Rc5#
1.Kc5 Rf6 2.Rc4 Sd3#


(This post in Greek language).